Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719555›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Understanding the contribution of primary and community services to health system resilience during the COVID19 Pandemic in Aotearoa, New Zealand: a qualitative interview study.

Vanessa Burholt, Janine Wiles, Alison Schneller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vanessa BurholtSchool of Nursing/School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Room 235B, Building 505, 85 Park Road, Private Bag 92019, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand. vanessa.burholt@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6789-127X
Janine WilesSocial and Community Health, School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-4630
Alison SchnellerSchool of Nursing, Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-4918

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 20/1380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical gaps in health system preparedness. This study, guided by a critical ecological model, examines the experiences of primary health and community services in Aotearoa New Zealand during the pandemic, focusing on their response to older people and their unpaid caregivers. The study aims to identify effective strategies for health system resilience. It addresses the question, what can we learn from the experiences of organisations supporting older people and caregivers during COVID-19, to prepare for other similar (emergency health) situations?

methodsA multidisciplinary research team conducted cross-sectional qualitative research through semi-structured telephone interviews with service providers (SPs) delivering primary or community home-based services to older people and caregivers across Aotearoa New Zealand. SPs included national organisations, Māori, Pacific, or rural providers and dementia services. Data were collected between July and October 2020. Notes were taken during interviews using a Rapid Appraisal Procedure grid, which were later revised and validated by participants. Data were analysed using a hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis, following COREQ guidelines.

resultsTwenty staff (Chief Executive Officers and representatives) from national organisations (N = 4), Māori (N = 3), Pacific (N = 5), rural (N = 4), and regional dementia (N = 4) SPs were interviewed. SPs demonstrated resilience through collaboration, adapting delivery models, and upskilling staff. Key challenges involved inconsistent identification of vulnerable clients, limited access to aged residential care, and barriers relating to digital access which disproportionately affected older adults and staff, and clients in rural areas. Workforce shortages, and unclear public policy concerning travel across regions further complicated service delivery, highlighting the interaction between policy, community, interpersonal, and individual factors.

conclusionsAotearoa New Zealand managed COVID-19 effectively, but the pandemic exposed areas for improvement in health system resilience. The government demonstrated absorptive resilience through swift actions, including lockdowns and clear communication, while SPs exhibited adaptive resilience by modifying service protocols. Knowledge gained from this study can contribute to transformative resilience. Long-term strategic changes are necessary to improve emergency planning, such as developing a unified framework to inform a 'Priority List', enhancing workforce capacity, and addressing digital exclusion. These steps can strengthen health system robustness and preparedness for future crises.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesCOVID-19Primary Health CareQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2AgedCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNew ZealandPandemicsAotearoa New ZealandCommunity servicesCOVID-19Emergency preparednessHealth system resilienceOlder people

Identifiers

PMID39719555
PMCPMC11667889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.