ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Validation of the Uscom BP+ automated oscillometric blood pressure monitor for professional office use in children and adolescents according to the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018).
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To (1) assess the accuracy of the Uscom BP+ oscillometric upper-arm professional blood pressure (BP) monitor in children and adolescents as per the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018); (2) assess the suitability of a non-standard cuff; and (3) assess the impact of motion artefact on device accuracy and precision. Children and adolescents were recruited to fulfil the sex/cuff distribution criteria of the Universal Standard. Single arm sequential BP measurements were used, the test device measured on deflate with an altered child/adolescent algorithm, using three standard (Extra Small, Small Adult, Adult) and, as exploratory analysis, additionally in one non-standard cuff (Wide Range; WR) (arm circumferences: 12-17, 16-24, 22-32, 22-42 cm, respectively). The presence of motion artefact was determined and its impact on BP assessed. One-hundred-forty participants were recruited with 123 included for analysis. When using the Extra Small, Small Adult and Adult cuffs only, the BP+ passed both criteria (95 participants, 321 pairs, -0.1 ± 7.3/ - 1.6 ± 7.6 and 5.72/6.50 mmHg systolic/diastolic) (reference thresholds: ≤5 ± 8, ≤6.95/6.76, respectively). The inclusion of the WR cuff showed unacceptable imprecision, and motion artefact had a substantial influence on test device precision. The Uscom BP+ fulfilled the requirements of the Universal Standard in children and adolescents when using the altered algorithm with the three standard cuffs and can be recommended for clinical use. The WR cuff cannot be recommended in this population in measure-on-deflate mode due to its imprecision. Additionally, BP measurement accuracy in children and adolescents can be improved through inclusion of a motion artefact detection system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39719530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.