Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719502›Full record

Observational studyEye (London, England)2025

2-year results from an observational study of proactive treatment regimens with intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg in patients with nAMD in clinical practice: XTEND study UK cohort.

Clare Bailey, Manju Chandran, Richard Gale, Nirodhini Narendran, James Talks, Hellen McGoey, Zinab Keshk, Peter Morgan-Warren, Helmut Allmeier, Tobias Machewitz and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03939767 (Evaluation of an eXtended and proacTive Dosing regimEn in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03939767 completednot on this map

Evaluation of an eXtended and proacTive Dosing regimEn in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)

TypeobservationalSponsorBayerRan2019 to 2023Enrolled1,563ConditionsWet Age-related Macular DegenerationArmsAflibercept (Eylea, BAY86-5321)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clare BaileyDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK. Clare.Bailey@uhbw.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-4512
Manju ChandranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK.
Richard GaleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Nirodhini NarendranDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
James TalksDepartment of Ophthalmology, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Hellen McGoeyDepartment of Medical Affairs, Bayer Plc, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9579-9390
Zinab KeshkDepartment of Medical Affairs, Bayer Plc, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Peter Morgan-WarrenBayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Helmut AllmeierBayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias MachewitzBayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Praveen J Patel *UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8682-4067
Deepali Varma *Department of Ophthalmology, Sunderland Eye Infirmary, South Tyneside & Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe 36-month XTEND (NCT03939767) multicentre, observational, prospective study examined the effectiveness of proactive treatment regimens of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) 2 mg in treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice. The 12- and 24-month outcomes from the XTEND UK cohort are reported.

methodsPatients aged ≥50 years with nAMD planned to receive IVT-AFL 2 mg were eligible. After three initial monthly IVT-AFL injections, treatment intervals could be extended in 2- to 4-weekly increments to a maximum of 16 weeks (8-week minimum treatment interval). Endpoints included mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) at month (M) 12 and M24. Treatment intervals and safety were assessed. Statistics were descriptive.

resultsIn the UK, 496 patients from 23 centres were treated (mean age 79.7 years, 64.3% female). From a baseline BCVA (mean ± SD) of 55.2 ± 15.8 letters, mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in BCVA was +3.4 (2.0, 4.9) letters at M12 and +1.3 (- 0.3, 2.9) letters at M24. From a baseline CST (mean ± SD) of 395 ± 143 μm, mean (95% CI) change in CST was -105 ( 121, -89) μm at M12 and -105 (- 122, -88) μm at M24. By M12 and M24, patients had received a mean ± SD of 7.4 ± 2.4 and 10.7 ± 4.6 injections, respectively. Outcomes in patients enrolled prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic were comparable. No new safety concerns were identified.

conclusionsDespite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients in the UK achieved and maintained clinically meaningful improvements in functional and anatomic outcomes through M24.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03939767.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsWet Macular DegenerationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomafliberceptAngiogenesis InhibitorsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID39719502
PMCPMC11978859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.