Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719483›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Machine learning for predicting acute myocardial infarction in patients with sepsis.

Shusheng Fang, Hongjin Jin, Jiayu Zhang, Yali Wang, Wenyu Nan, Yanhao Feng, Wen Su, Xiaodong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Troponin elevation in sepsis: when numbers mislead and clinical context matters.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shusheng FangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Hongjin JinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Jiayu ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Yali WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Wenyu NanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Yanhao FengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Wen SuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China.
Xiaodong JiangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, Liaoning, China. xd1981@sohu.com.

Funding

“1 + X” Plan Clinical Technology Improvement Project of the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University 2022LCJSGC11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and sepsis are the leading causes of high mortality rates in intensive care units. While sepsis frequently affects the cardiovascular system, distinguishing between sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy and AMI remains challenging due to overlapping biomarkers. Misdiagnosis can hinder timely treatment and increase risk of complications. This study used multidimensional clinical data and machine learning techniques to develop and validate a novel predictive model for identifying AMI in critically ill patients with sepsis. Data from patients with sepsis were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database. Six machine learning algorithms were employed for model construction. Additionally, the machine learning-based models were compared with traditional scoring systems. Model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability. In total, 2,103 critically ill patients with sepsis were included, 459 (21.8%) of whom experienced AMI during hospitalization. A total of 26 variables were selected for model construction. Among all models, the Gradient Boosting Classifier model demonstrated the best predictive performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability. Machine learning models have the potential to serve as tools for predicting AMI in patients with sepsis. The Gradient Boosting Classifier model developed herein demonstrated promising predictive performance, supporting clinicians in identifying patients at high-risk of sepsis and implementing early interventions to reduce mortality rates.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMyocardial InfarctionSepsisAgedAlgorithmsCritical IllnessFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisAcute myocardial infarctionMachine learningMIMIC-IV databasePrediction modelSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39719483
PMCPMC11668874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.