Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719474›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Artificial intelligence and MRI in sinonasal tumors discrimination: where do we stand?

Giacomo Gravante, Alberto Daniele Arosio, Nico Curti, Riccardo Biondi, Luigi Berardi, Alberto Gandolfi, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Paolo Castelnuovo, Daniel Remondini, Maurizio Bignami

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giacomo GravanteDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy. giacomo.gravante1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-6485
Alberto Daniele ArosioDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.
Nico CurtiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Riccardo BiondiData Science and Bioinformatics Laboratory, IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi BerardiDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.
Alberto GandolfiDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.
Mario Turri-ZanoniDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale Sant'Anna, Como, Italy.
Paolo CastelnuovoDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.
Daniel RemondiniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maurizio BignamiDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates high potential when applied to radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to discriminate sinonasal tumors. This can enhance diagnostic suspicion beyond visual assessment alone and prior to biopsy, leading to expedite the diagnostic timeline and the treatment planning. The aim of the present work is to evaluate the current advancements and accuracy of this technology in this domain.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria comprised studies utilizing any machine learning approach applied to MRI of patients with sinonasal tumors. For each study, comprehensive data were gathered on the MRI protocols, feature extraction techniques, and classifiers employed to develop the AI model. The performance was assessed based on accuracy and area under the curve (AUC).

resultsFourteen studies, published between May 2017 and August 2024, were included. These studies were categorized into three groups: those examining both benign and malignant tumors, those investigating malignant tumor subpopulations, and those focusing on benign pathologies. All studies reported an AUC greater than 0.800, achieving AUC > 0.89 and accuracy > 0.81 when incorporating clinical-radiological variables. Notably, the best discrimination performance was observed in studies utilizing combined conventional MRI sequences, including T1-weighted, contrasted T1-weighted, and T2-weighted images.

conclusionThe application of AI and radiomics in analyzing MRI scans presents significant promise for improving the discrimination of sinonasal tumors. Integrating clinical and radiological indicators enhances model performance, suggesting that future research should focus on larger patient cohorts and diverse AI methodologies to refine diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiscrimination modelMachine learningMRISinonasal tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.