ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Ten-Year Outcomes and Predictors of Mortality Following Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: From Serendipity to Precision Biological Ablation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world characteristics and management of ventricular tachycardias in ICD patients: Data from the VIDEO registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- The VISTA Scores: Development and Internal Validation of Novel Clinical Models for Predicting Recurrence and Mortality After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of transcatheter ablation in ischaemic ventricular tachycardia: should we be using it more?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes in Patients Without Previous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Article
- Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcomes following ventricular tachycardia ablation: a propensity-matched analysis from a large multicentre database.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Outcomes comparison between catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in Chagas disease versus ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy - a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Periprocedural Outcomes of VT Ablation in Ischemic Compared to Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2025Article
- Case report of ventricular tachycardia simulation facilitated ablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmia post-myocardial infarction: aiming before firing.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCatheter ablation is the primary treatment option for idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). It plays a key role in acute therapy of electrical storm, treatment of VTs in patients with structural heart disease (SHD), and can reduce VT burden. Here we report on 10-year clinical outcomes following VT ablation from patients enrolled in the prospective German Ablation Registry. METHODS AND
resultsLong-term follow-up was conducted on 334 patients undergoing VT ablation (118/334, 35%) with structurally normal hearts and 216 out of 334 (65%) with SHD, including 161 out of 216 (75%) with ischemic heart disease at 38 centers. Follow-up was completed in 94.8% of patients. Median observation time was 10.8 (4.3-12.3) years, with a 10-year all-cause mortality rate of 39.4%. VT ablation in patients with SHD was associated with worse outcome when compared with patients with structurally normal hearts (estimated 10-year mortality for SHD 54.8% versus structurally normal hearts 12.1%). Estimated 10-year mortality following VT ablation was highest in patients with ischemic heart disease (62.4%). Significant predictors of mortality following VT ablation included age (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35 [1.90-2.92] per decade), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (HR, 2.11 [1.44-3.10]), diabetes (HR, 1.73 [1.14-2.61]), incessant VT (HR, 2.96 [1.74-5.03]), linear lesion (HR, 1.46 [0.99-2.16]), and acute procedural failure (HR, 2.57 [1.39-4.77]). Procedural failure was the only statistically significant predictor for VT recurrence during follow-up (HR, 3.76 [1.59-8.91]).
conclusionsWithin an all-comer patient cohort, estimated 10-year all-cause mortality following VT ablation is 39.4%. Mortality after VT ablation is worse in patients with SHD and highest for patients with ischemic heart disease. Acute procedural success plays a major role in predicting VT recurrence and long-term mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.