ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Optimal Definition and Risk Stratification in Prediabetes With Stable Coronary Heart Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends and hotspots evolution in type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with coronary heart disease: a bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2026.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The role of 5-methylcytosine regulator-related genes in diagnostic and immune regulatory functions in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal definition and risk stratification approach to identify high-risk patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease has not been well studied to date. The objective of the current study is to compare the prognostic value of different definitions of prediabetes, and to explore the role of "very-high-risk" (VHR) criteria according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guideline in the risk stratification of patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease. METHODS AND
resultsThis prospective large-cohort study enrolled a total of 7930 patients with stable coronary heart disease. Prediabetes was defined according to various guidelines and further classified on the basis of the VHR criteria according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guideline. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which was defined as the composite end point of cardiac death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, and stroke. During a median of 3 years' follow-up, a total of 256 MACEs occurred. Prediabetes defined according to the World Health Organization/International Expert Committee criteria was associated with significant increased MACE risk compared with normoglycemia (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.484 [95% CI, 1.139-1.935];
conclusionsOur findings suggested the potential use of the World Health Organization/International Expert Committee definition and VHR criteria in risk stratification of patients with prediabetes and stable coronary heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.