Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery Program: A Prospective, Phase III, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What is the effect of education on fatigue in adults with neurological conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoststroke fatigue affects ≈50% of patients with stroke, causing significant personal, societal, and economic burden. In the FASTER (Fatigue After Stroke Educational Recovery) study, we assessed a group-based educational intervention for poststroke fatigue. METHODS AND
resultsTwo hundred patients with clinically significant fatigue were included and randomized to either a general stroke education control or fatigue management group (FMG) intervention and assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months. The FMG involved weekly psychoeducation sessions over 6 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were the Fatigue Severity Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 total scores. Adjusted mean total Fatigue Severity Scale scores at 6 weeks (primary end point) were nearly identical for the education control and FMG groups. The adjusted mean difference between treatment groups was -0.13 (SE, 1.4;
conclusionsWe found no evidence of significant group-level benefits of FMG over and above general stroke education. Educational group-based interventions for poststroke fatigue should continue to be refined and examined, including consideration of potential impacts at an individual level. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/; UnIque identifier: ACTRN12619000626167.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.