ArticleRMD open2024
Anatomy-centred deep learning improves generalisability and progression prediction in radiographic sacroiliitis detection.
Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Progression to Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Narrative Review on Timeline and Novel Prediction Factors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Year in Review: Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Anatomical Features of the Sacroiliac Joint and Machine Learning-Based Classification of Disease Types.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis: from clinical signs to multi-omics integration.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
- Imaging pathways in spondyloarthritis: integrating radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and artificial intelligence methods : Radiology and AI in SpA.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in rheumatic disease classification: an example of ankylosing spondylitis severity inspection model.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of combining magnetic resonance images and radiographs on radiographic grading of sacroiliitis and classification in axial spondyloarthritis: a reliability study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- AI for imaging evaluation in rheumatology: applications of radiomics and computer vision-current status, future prospects and potential challenges.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine whether incorporating anatomy-centred deep learning can improve generalisability and enable prediction of disease progression.
methodsThis retrospective multicentre study included conventional pelvic radiographs of four different patient cohorts focusing on axial spondyloarthritis collected at university and community hospitals. The first cohort, which consisted of 1483 radiographs, was split into training (n=1261) and validation (n=222) sets. The other cohorts comprising 436, 340 and 163 patients, respectively, were used as independent test datasets. For the second cohort, follow-up data of 311 patients was used to examine progression prediction capabilities. Two neural networks were trained, one on images cropped to the bounding box of the sacroiliac joints (anatomy-centred) and the other one on full radiographs. The performance of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
resultsOn the three test datasets, the standard model achieved AUC scores of 0.853, 0.817, 0.947, with an accuracy of 0.770, 0.724, 0.850. Whereas the anatomy-centred model achieved AUC scores of 0.899, 0.846, 0.957, with an accuracy of 0.821, 0.744, 0.906, respectively. The patients who were identified as high risk by the anatomy-centred model had an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.19, 3.86) for having progression of radiographic sacroiliitis within 2 years.
conclusionAnatomy-centred deep learning can improve the generalisability of models in detecting radiographic sacroiliitis. The model is published as fully open source alongside this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.