Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719299›Full record

ArticleRMD open2024

Anatomy-centred deep learning improves generalisability and progression prediction in radiographic sacroiliitis detection.

Felix J Dorfner, Janis L Vahldiek, Leonhard Donle, Andrei Zhukov, Lina Xu, Hartmut Häntze, Marcus R Makowski, Hugo J W L Aerts, Fabian Proft, Valeria Rios Rodriguez and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Year in Review: Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Felix J DorfnerDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-5914-3233
Janis L VahldiekDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-1424
Leonhard DonleDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andrei ZhukovDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lina XuDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hartmut HäntzeDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Germany.
Hugo J W L AertsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Fabian ProftDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4306-033X
Valeria Rios RodriguezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5612-043X
Judith RademacherDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7442-2570
Mikhail ProtopopovDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4840-5069
Hildrun HaibelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kay-Geert HermannDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Torsten DiekhoffDepartment of Radiology, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3593-1449
Lisa C AdamsDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Munchen, Germany.
Murat TorgutalpDepartment of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4600-9484
Denis Poddubnyy *Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany denis.poddubnyy@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4537-6015
Keno K Bressem *Department of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology (incl. Nutrition Medicine), Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-8624

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether incorporating anatomy-centred deep learning can improve generalisability and enable prediction of disease progression.

methodsThis retrospective multicentre study included conventional pelvic radiographs of four different patient cohorts focusing on axial spondyloarthritis collected at university and community hospitals. The first cohort, which consisted of 1483 radiographs, was split into training (n=1261) and validation (n=222) sets. The other cohorts comprising 436, 340 and 163 patients, respectively, were used as independent test datasets. For the second cohort, follow-up data of 311 patients was used to examine progression prediction capabilities. Two neural networks were trained, one on images cropped to the bounding box of the sacroiliac joints (anatomy-centred) and the other one on full radiographs. The performance of the models was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

resultsOn the three test datasets, the standard model achieved AUC scores of 0.853, 0.817, 0.947, with an accuracy of 0.770, 0.724, 0.850. Whereas the anatomy-centred model achieved AUC scores of 0.899, 0.846, 0.957, with an accuracy of 0.821, 0.744, 0.906, respectively. The patients who were identified as high risk by the anatomy-centred model had an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.19, 3.86) for having progression of radiographic sacroiliitis within 2 years.

conclusionAnatomy-centred deep learning can improve the generalisability of models in detecting radiographic sacroiliitis. The model is published as fully open source alongside this study.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDisease ProgressionSacroiliitisAdultArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSacroiliac JointSensitivity and SpecificityAxial SpondyloarthritisClassificationMachine LearningSpondylitis, Ankylosing

Identifiers

PMID39719299
PMCPMC11751840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.