SynthesisBMJ open2024
Development of evidence-based standards for inpatient physiotherapy services: a systematic review and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePerformance standards are critical to service design and quality improvement. There are no published standards defining the care inpatients should receive from physiotherapists in Aotearoa New Zealand. This study aims to explore the potential of using clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to develop a set of evidence-based standards for physiotherapy in inpatient settings.
designA systematic review and content analysis of CPGs. DATA SOURCES: Scholarly databases (Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus, PEDro) and grey literature (guideline databases - NICE, SIGN, ECRI guideline trust, Guidelines International Network (GIN)) were searched between July and September 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: CPGs related to conditions and treatments common to physiotherapy in a secondary care setting were included. Mental health conditions, paediatrics, COVID-19 and conditions common to tertiary care were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A pragmatic approach was taken to group guidelines aligned with common physiotherapy services and select only the most recent and comprehensive guidelines for final analysis. The quality of CPGs was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II). Data from guideline recommendations of relevance to inpatient physiotherapy were grouped into themes. Summative 'statements' were drafted to represent the content of each theme; these were given a confidence rating based on the number of supporting guidelines and the strength or grade of evidence awarded by the guideline group.
resultsThe recommendations of 32 CPGs yielded 27 statements.
conclusionTwenty-seven statements represent a distillation of the best evidence-based practice recommendations from CPGs in inpatient physiotherapy. Statements of physiotherapy dosage (frequency, intensity and duration) are not available for many areas of practice; researchers and CPG groups should consider the importance of these data for service commissioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.