Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39719285›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2024

Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practices of healthcare staff and students regarding disposal of unwantead medications: a systematic review.

Janeme Lam, Dayana El Nsouli, E Lyn Lee, Tawfiq Alqeisi, Ros Kane, Ian McGonagle, Despina Laparidou, David Nelson, Keivan Armani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janeme LamDepartment of Pharmacy, Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust, Northampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6453-9410
Dayana El NsouliDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4961-4399
E Lyn LeeDepartment of Pharmacy, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-2414
Tawfiq AlqeisiTrauma and Orthopaedics, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6124-0816
Ros KaneSchool of Health and Care Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-2530
Ian McGonagleSchool of Health and Care Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8231-7428
Despina LaparidouCommunity and Health Research Unit, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-7422
David NelsonLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, College of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2173-683X
Keivan ArmaniDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, London, UK k.armani@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5674-2765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe sought to review studies that examine healthcare professionals' and students' knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding medication disposal. We also explore recommendations and barriers related to appropriate medication disposal.

designA systematic review was conducted that adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched up to 23 February 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND

settingQualitative, quantitative and mixed-method primary research studies. There was no limitation on the publication date, geographical locations or the study settings.

participantsPharmacists, doctors, nurses and students from these respective professional groups in any country. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The levels of healthcare staff and students' KAPs about disposal of unwanted medications. DATE EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data extraction was conducted by four of the researchers independently. The study details were categorised into three main domains, that is, KAP using the KAP model. Other relevant information was also extracted, and synthesised in overall themes, such as challenges and recommendations.

resultsThirty-seven studies from 18 countries (Asia n=21, the USA n=7, Africa n=5, EU n=2, South America n=2) were included. 86.5% (n=32) investigated participants' knowledge of medication disposal. Although there was a good level of awareness about the environmental impacts, there were significant gaps in knowledge regarding correct disposal methods, available services, guidelines and training. Thirty studies explored participants' attitudes towards medication disposal. There was a generally positive attitude towards the need for environmentally safe disposal practices. Thirty-five studies evaluated participants' practices in relation to medication disposal. Although there was generally a positive attitude and some understanding of appropriate disposal methods, the majority of the participants did not follow the practice guidelines, especially outside healthcare settings. DISCUSSIONS AND

conclusionsAlthough healthcare staff and students have fair knowledge and positive attitudes towards medicine disposal, their actual practices are lacking. One significant challenge identified is the limited awareness about proper disposal methods coupled with a lack of established services or guidelines. Even in cases where take-back programmes are available, they often face issues with accessibility. To tackle these challenges, it is suggested that governmental bodies should establish and enforce clear policies on medication disposal while also expanding educational initiatives to increase understanding among professionals and students. Furthermore, improving access to take-back programmes is crucial for ensuring safe medication disposal and minimising potential environmental and health hazards. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024503162.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansMedical Waste DisposalMedical Waste DisposalAttitudeBehaviorClimate ChangeKnowledgeMedicineSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39719285
PMCPMC11667366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.