ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Gretl-variation GRaph Evaluation TooLkit.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pangenomic analyses in the cultivated grapevine confirm high genomic collinearity and extensive dispensable gene content likely involved in adaptation.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Building and applying pangenome references to capture genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Graph-based pangenomes and pan-phenome provide a cornerstone for eggplant biology and breeding.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Complexity welcome: Pangenome graphs for comprehensive population genomics.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Review
- Technological Development and Advances for Constructing and Analyzing Plant Pangenomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAs genome graphs are powerful data structures for representing the genetic diversity within populations, they can help identify genomic variations that traditional linear references miss, but their complexity and size makes the analysis of genome graphs challenging. We sought to develop a genome graph analysis tool that helps these analyses to become more accessible by addressing the limitations of existing tools. Specifically, we improve scalability and user-friendliness, and we provide many new statistics tailored to variation graphs for graph evaluation, including sample-specific features.
resultsWe developed an efficient, comprehensive, and integrated tool, gretl, to analyze genome graphs and gain insights into their structure and composition by providing a wide range of statistics. gretl can be utilized to evaluate different graphs, compare the output of graph construction pipelines with different parameters, as well as perform an in-depth analysis of individual graphs, including sample-specific analysis. With the assistance of gretl, novel patterns of genetic variation and potential regions of interest can be identified, for later, more detailed inspection. We demonstrate that gretl outperforms other tools in terms of speed, particularly for larger genome graphs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Commented Rust source code and documentation is available under MIT license at https://github.com/MoinSebi/gretl together with Python scripts and step-by-step usage examples. The package is available at Bioconda for easy installation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.