ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society2025
Comparing standard treatment of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea to add-on acetazolamide treatment: An open-label randomised controlled trial.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacotherapy in obstructive sleep apnoea: a clinical guide.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition, featured by repetitive upper airway collapse during sleep manifested with poor quality of life and co-morbidities. Although continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the recommended therapy, lack of patient compliance and persistent symptoms often preclude its success. The present study evaluates the effect of acetazolamide in combination with CPAP, and compares this treatment strategy to single therapy using CPAP in moderate to severe OSA. MATERIALS AND
methodsA parallel-group, open-label randomized controlled trial consisted of 95 subjects diagnosed with moderate to severe OSA. Subjects were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to CPAP plus acetazolamide (C+D) and CPAP alone (C). The baseline characteristics and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) metrics were comparable. Following four weeks of intervention, the outcomes measured involved changes in AHI (apnea hypopnoea index), sleep architecture, ODI (oxygen desaturation Index), and other sleep parameters.
resultsThe combination of CPAP and acetazolamide significantly reduced total AHI (34.69 ± 18.91 events/hour) compared to CPAP alone (45.47 ± 19.09 events/hour, p = 0.0044). AHI also observed significant improvements during non-REM sleep (p = 0.0014). Although no significant difference was found in AHI during REM sleep between the groups (p = 0.6284), the C+D group demonstrated a notable decrease in severe OSA cases and an increase in mild and moderate OSA classifications. Compliance-adjusted AHI was significantly lower in the C+D group (5.67 ± 3.45) compared to the C group (7.67 ± 3.41, p = 0.0034). The C+D group exhibited improved sleep architecture with lower percentages of N1 and N3 sleep stages, and a trend towards increased REM sleep percentage (p = 0.0704). Significant reductions in WASO (p = 0.0404) and ODI (p = 0.0301) were also observed. Both groups reported minimal and comparable side effects, indicating the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy.
conclusionThe addition of acetazolamide to CPAP therapy improves efficacy in OSA treatment parameters among moderate-to-severe OSA, reduces total and NREM AHI as well as ODI without an increase in adverse effects. With added pharmacotherapy, the combination therapy represents a potential adjunctive treatment for managing OSA.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.