Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718779›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

FuncFetch: an LLM-assisted workflow enables mining thousands of enzyme-substrate interactions from published manuscripts.

Nathaniel Smith, Xinyu Yuan, Chesney Melissinos, Gaurav Moghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Large Language Models in Bio-Ontology Research: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathaniel SmithPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Xinyu YuanPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Chesney MelissinosPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Gaurav MoghePlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-064X

Funding

National Science Foundation #2310395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThousands of genomes are publicly available, however, most genes in those genomes have poorly defined functions. This is partly due to a gap between previously published, experimentally characterized protein activities and activities deposited in databases. This activity deposition is bottlenecked by the time-consuming biocuration process. The emergence of large language models presents an opportunity to speed up the text-mining of protein activities for biocuration.

resultsWe developed FuncFetch-a workflow that integrates NCBI E-Utilities, OpenAI's GPT-4, and Zotero-to screen thousands of manuscripts and extract enzyme activities. Extensive validation revealed high precision and recall of GPT-4 in determining whether the abstract of a given paper indicates the presence of a characterized enzyme activity in that paper. Provided the manuscript, FuncFetch extracted data such as species information, enzyme names, sequence identifiers, substrates, and products, which were subjected to extensive quality analyses. Comparison of this workflow against a manually curated dataset of BAHD acyltransferase activities demonstrated a precision/recall of 0.86/0.64 in extracting substrates. We further deployed FuncFetch on nine large plant enzyme families. Screening 26 543 papers, FuncFetch retrieved 32 605 entries from 5459 selected papers. We also identified multiple extraction errors including incorrect associations, nontarget enzymes, and hallucinations, which highlight the need for further manual curation. The BAHD activities were verified, resulting in a comprehensive functional fingerprint of this family and revealing that ∼70% of the experimentally characterized enzymes are uncurated in the public domain. FuncFetch represents an advance in biocuration and lays the groundwork for predicting the functions of uncharacterized enzymes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and minimally curated activities are available at: https://github.com/moghelab/funcfetch and https://tools.moghelab.org/funczymedb.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData MiningEnzymesSoftwareDatabases, ProteinWorkflowEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID39718779
PMCPMC11734755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.