SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2025
Bromocriptine Versus Levodopa and other treatments in Parkinson's Disease: an updated Meta-analysis Involving more than 4000 patients across 12 randomized clinical trials.
Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to conduct a comparative study by systematically examining and analyzing trials that studied the impacts of levodopa and bromocriptine, either separately or together, in treating Parkinson's disease (PD).
methodsAn extensive literature search was conducted across PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using targeted keywords for studies published up to October 2024. The methodological quality of included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and bias evaluation was performed using RevMan (version 5). Statistical analyses were conducted in STATA version 17, applying random-effects models. The overall quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
resultsThe thorough evaluation identified 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4,060 participants, 1,956 in the intervention group and 2,104 in the comparison group, all diagnosed with PD. A combined effect size of 0.18 (SMD: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.03, 0.39) was found through quantitative analysis of motor scales for the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). An effect size of 0.50 (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.80) was determined for dyskinesia. Dystonia occurrences showed a significant effect size of 0.44 (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.81; I2: 87.28%; P value: 0.0001). Hallucination and dizziness occurrences showed effect sizes of 0.91 (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.30) and 1.36 (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.91, 2.04) overall, respectively. Quality assessment revealed high-certainty evidence for dyskinesia and dystonia reduction with bromocriptine, while other outcomes showed low to very low certainty. Meta-regression analyses showed no significant correlation between population characteristics and outcomes.
conclusionThis thorough meta-analysis offers an understanding of how bromocriptine compares in effectiveness to levodopa and other treatments for managing PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39718740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.