ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Probiotics: Insights from In Vitro Assays.
Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Antimicrobial efficacy ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Enhancement of intestinal barrier function and alleviation of mycophenolic acid toxicity by a probiotic-conditioned mediumFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Probiotic Spores ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are microorganisms that provide health benefits at adequate doses and exhibit notable antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. These properties play crucial roles in combating chronic diseases linked to oxidative stress and antimicrobial resistance. This review aimed to summarize the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of probiotics determined in in vitro studies and discuss mechanistic actions and analysis methods. The MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Embase databases were utilized. The included articles demonstrated the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of both isolated and food matrix-associated probiotics, with the most common genera being Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces, and Streptococcus. Antioxidant activity was the most studied property, yielding varied results attributed to evaluation tests and probiotic strain. Antibacterial activity was consistently reported in all studies. Additionally, fermentation with probiotic microorganisms improved the content and bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds. In conclusion, analysis results highlight the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of probiotics reported in in vitro studies. They enhance bioactive content and bioaccessibility and produce novel beneficial metabolites during fermentation. These results reinforce the therapeutic promise of probiotics associated with plant matrices and indicate the need for clinical studies to confirm their efficacy in improving human health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39718712What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.