Trial reportAngiogenesis2024
Effect of oral nintedanib vs placebo on epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: the EPICURE multicenter randomized double-blind trial.
Trial report in Angiogenesis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03954782 (Efficacy of Nintedanib Per os as a Treatment for Epistaxis in HHT Disease. A National, Randomized, Multicentre Phase II Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of Nintedanib Per os as a Treatment for Epistaxis in HHT Disease. A National, Randomized, Multicentre Phase II Study
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation and clinical application of the hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-specific quality of life scale.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2026Article
- Executive summary of the 15th HHT international scientific conference.Angiogenesis · 2025Article
- Epistaxis Prevention, Treatment, and Future Perspectives for Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Standardization of Terminology, Definitions, and Outcome Criteria for Bleeding in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: International Consensus Report.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epistaxis greatly affects patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Although few systemic treatment exist, nintedanib, is a good candidate thanks to its anti-angiogenic activity. Our main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of oral nintedanib on epistaxis duration in HHT patients with moderate to severe epistaxis. This multicenter phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted between June 2020 and February 2023. Inclusion criteria were being over 18 years old and having a confirmed HHT diagnosis with an epistaxis severity score greater than 4. Sixty patients were randomized to receive either nintedanib or placebo for 12 weeks with a 12 week follow-up. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a reduction of at least 50% in mean monthly epistaxis duration comparing the 8 weeks before treatment to the last 8 weeks of treatment. Main secondary outcomes included monthly duration and frequency of epistaxis and hemoglobin levels. Of the 60 randomized patients, 56 completed the trial. Thirteen patients (43%) in the nintedanib group vs 8 (27%) in the placebo group met the primary endpoint (p = 0.28). We observed a significant decrease in median epistaxis (57% vs 27%, p = 0.013) and a significant increase in median hemoglobin levels (+ 18 vs - 1 g/L, p = 0.02) in the nintedanib vs the placebo group. Although we did not achieve our primary outcome, we observed a significant reduction in epistaxis duration and a significant increase in hemoglobin levels in patients treated with nintedanib. This supports the efficacy of nintedanib, and further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.