ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation induces stochastic resonance in vestibular perceptual thresholds assessed efficiently using confidence reports.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation improves postural stability under virtual reality perturbation by enhancing vestibular processing and multisensory integration.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Exploring GVS as a display modality: cutaneous sensations and cue association maintenance.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Two-segment aging of vestibular perceptual thresholds: motion-specific links to quiet-stance postural sway.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sensory perception, stochastic resonance (SR) refers to the application of noise to enhance information transfer, allowing for the sensing of lower-level stimuli. Previously, subjective-assessments identified SR in vestibular perceptual thresholds, assessed using a standard two alternative (i.e., binary), forced-choice task, when applying noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS). However, this required extensive testing of at least 100 binary trials to yield sufficiently precise thresholds at each of several nGVS amplitudes, leading to confounds of fatigue, sleepiness, learning, etc. stalling the study of vestibular SR. To mitigate this, we explore confidence reporting, which via a confidence signal detection (CSD) model may much more efficiently identify SR (i.e., with fewer trials), if SR exists in CSD thresholds. To test this, Y-translation thresholds were tested with 100 trials at each nGVS amplitude (0 or sham, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mA peak-to-peak). To objectively identify SR, we applied a machine learning classification algorithm trained on simulated datasets. We found significant evidence of SR exhibition using CSD thresholds (p = 0.0025), with six of 10 subjects classified as exhibiting SR. Next, we considered fewer trials, finding the false positive rate of SR identification to be better using CSD thresholds with as few as 50 trials, when compared to 100 binary trials. Applying the CSD model to our subject's data with a subset of their trials found similar classifications of SR exhibition as with 100 binary trials. We demonstrate CSD thresholds exhibit SR, proving a means of better and much more efficiently identifying SR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39718639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.