Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718636›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2025

Effectiveness of the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method in reducing coronary stent edge dissection.

Ryosuke Amisaki, Tomomi Watanabe, Satoshi Kobara, Kazuhiro Yamamoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryosuke AmisakiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishicho, Yonago, Japan. ryosuke.amisaki@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5097-9388
Tomomi WatanabeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishicho, Yonago, Japan.
Satoshi KobaraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishicho, Yonago, Japan.
Kazuhiro YamamotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Endocrinology and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 86 Nishicho, Yonago, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal procedural protocol for coronary stent deployment remains undetermined. Post-dilation with a high-pressure balloon is often performed to optimize the stent expansion. However, high-pressure dilation also carries the potential risk of coronary artery injury. A previous in vitro study reported that multiple-times balloon inflation at the same pressure resulted in better stent expansion compared to one-time balloon inflation. In our facility, we frequently perform the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method, wherein the stent delivery balloon was inflated 3 times at nominal pressure to deploy the stent, to improve stent expansion without high-pressure balloon inflation. Although this method seems effective in avoiding excessive high-pressure dilation, its clinical data are insufficient. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes of the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method. This retrospective study included 370 patients with 467 stented coronary lesions. These subjects were divided into two groups: one with standard balloon inflation and the other with repeated 3-time balloon inflation, and treatment outcomes were compared. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group had 254 lesions, and the standard-balloon-inflation group had 213 lesions. Stent edge dissection occurred in 6 lesions (2.8%) in the standard-balloon-inflation group, whereas did not occur in the repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation group. A statistically significant difference remained even after propensity score matching (p = 0.040). The final minimum stent area and long-term clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. The repeated 3-time-balloon-inflation method may reduce stent edge dissection while demonstrating comparable minimal stent area and long-term outcomes to the standard-balloon-inflation method.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsStentsAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomePercutaneous coronary interventionPost-dilationStent edge dissectionThe repeated 3-time balloon inflation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.