ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024
Visualizing Patient Pathways and Identifying Data Repositories in a UK Neurosciences Center: Exploratory Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Implementation of a Business Process Model and Notation for Modeling Patient Health Care Trajectories: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health and clinical activity data are a vital resource for research, improving patient care and service efficiency. Health care data are inherently complex, and their acquisition, storage, retrieval, and subsequent analysis require a thorough understanding of the clinical pathways underpinning such data. Better use of health care data could lead to improvements in patient care and service delivery. However, this depends on the identification of relevant datasets. Objective: We aimed to demonstrate the application of business process modeling notation (BPMN) to represent clinical pathways at a UK neurosciences center and map the clinical activity to corresponding data flows into electronic health records and other nonstandard data repositories. Methods: We used BPMN to map and visualize a patient journey and the subsequent movement and storage of patient data. After identifying several datasets that were being held outside of the standard applications, we collected information about these datasets using a questionnaire. Results: We identified 13 standard applications where neurology clinical activity was captured as part of the patient's electronic health record including applications and databases for managing referrals, outpatient activity, laboratory data, imaging data, and clinic letters. We also identified 22 distinct datasets not within standard applications that were created and managed within the neurosciences department, either by individuals or teams. These were being used to deliver direct patient care and included datasets for tracking patient blood results, recording home visits, and tracking triage status. Conclusions: Mapping patient data flows and repositories allowed us to identify areas wherein the current electronic health record does not fulfill the needs of day-to-day patient care. Data that are being stored outside of standard applications represent a potential duplication in the effort and risks being overlooked. Future work should identify unmet data needs to inform correct data capture and centralization within appropriate data architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.