Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718548›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2025

Synaptic sabotage: How Tau and α-Synuclein undermine synaptic health.

Valerie Uytterhoeven, Patrik Verstreken, Eliana Nachman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valerie UytterhoevenVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Center for Brain and Disease Research , Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3100-2079
Patrik VerstrekenVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Center for Brain and Disease Research , Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5073-5393
Eliana NachmanVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie Center for Brain and Disease Research , Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2069-6469

Funding

Aligning Science Across Parkinson'sChan Zuckerberg InitiativeCure Alzheimer's FundEuropean Research CouncilFlemish GovernmentFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1282123NKU LeuvenRainwater Charitable FoundationSAO-FRAVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic dysfunction is one of the earliest cellular defects observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD), occurring before widespread protein aggregation, neuronal loss, and cognitive decline. While the field has focused on the aggregation of Tau and α-Synuclein (α-Syn), emerging evidence suggests that these proteins may drive presynaptic pathology even before their aggregation. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms by which Tau and α-Syn affect presynaptic terminals offers an opportunity for developing innovative therapeutics aimed at preserving synapses and potentially halting neurodegeneration. This review focuses on the molecular defects that converge on presynaptic dysfunction caused by Tau and α-Syn. Both proteins have physiological roles in synapses. However, during disease, they acquire abnormal functions due to aberrant interactions and mislocalization. We provide an overview of current research on different essential presynaptic pathways influenced by Tau and α-Syn. Finally, we highlight promising therapeutic targets aimed at maintaining synaptic function in both tauopathies and synucleinopathies.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinSynapsestau ProteinsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsHumansParkinson DiseasePresynaptic TerminalsSynucleinopathiesTauopathiesalpha-Synucleintau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39718548
PMCPMC11668179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.