Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718531›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2025

Implementation of an Opt-Out and Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Testing Program for Pregnant Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Irene Stafford, Carrie Bakunas, Joe Haydamous, Ana Mosqueda, Jeffrey D Klausner, Leandro Mena, Sean C Blackwell

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07358949 (Feasibility and Acceptability of Point of Care Rapid Syphilis Testing Among Patients Seeking Family Planning Services in Hawai'i), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07358949 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Acceptability of Point of Care Rapid Syphilis Testing Among Patients Seeking Family Planning Services in Hawai'i

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen's Medical CenterRan2026 to 2027Enrolled70ConditionsSyphilis InfectionArmsRapid Syphilis Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Emergency Department Syphilis Screening: Insights from a National Stakeholder Convening.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Congenital Syphilis: From Near-Elimination to Crisis.American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Irene StaffordFrom the University of Texas at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2803-7329
Carrie BakunasFrom the University of Texas at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Joe HaydamousFrom the University of Texas at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Ana MosquedaFrom the University of Texas at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Jeffrey D KlausnerUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Leandro MenaAll-In Health Solutions LLC, Atlanta, GA.
Sean C BlackwellFrom the University of Texas at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult and congenital syphilis rates are rising in the United States. The aim of this pre- and post-implementation study was to determine whether implementation of an opt-out laboratory-based and rapid syphilis point-of-care testing program in the emergency department (ED) improves the detection and treatment of syphilis during pregnancy in a high-prevalence region.

methodsThis pre- and post-implementation study was conducted at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX. During the pre-implementation phase (November 1, 2023-February 29, 2024), pregnant patients presenting to the ED underwent laboratory-based syphilis testing using the reverse algorithm only when clinically indicated. In the post-implementation phase (March 1, 2024-June 25, 2024), pregnant patients without prenatal care or with no documented syphilis result underwent opt-out syphilis testing using the Syphilis Health Check point-of-care test and the laboratory-based reverse syphilis testing algorithm. Patients with positive syphilis test results were treated by providers. All results were confirmed with the laboratory-based test, and patient follow-up was scheduled.

resultsDuring the pre-implementation period, 302 pregnant patients presented to the ED, and only 6 (2%) underwent syphilis laboratory-based testing, none of which yielded positive results. In the post-implementation period, 322 pregnant patients presented to the ED and 202 (62.7%) were approached. Of these, 114 (56.4%) were tested using either the Syphilis Health Check or laboratory-based reverse algorithm ( P < 0.001). Four patients tested positive for syphilis, indicating a prevalence of 3.5%.

conclusionsAn opt-out and rapid syphilis testing program for pregnant individuals visiting the ED increased syphilis screening from 2% to 56.4%, and detected syphilis that might have otherwise been missed.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care TestingPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSyphilis SerodiagnosisTexasYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39718531
PMCPMC12129393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.