Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718471›Full record

ReviewIUBMB life2025

Ethical bioprospecting and microbial assessments for sustainable solutions to the AMR crisis.

Kayla Cartledge, Francesca L Short, Alex Hall, Karen Lambert, Michael J McDonald, Trevor Lithgow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUBMB life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial solutions for a changing world.Sustainable microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayla CartledgeCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Francesca L ShortCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Alex HallCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-1205
Karen LambertCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Michael J McDonaldCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Trevor LithgowCentre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0102-7884

Funding

Australian Research Council DE200101524National Health and Medical Research Council 2016330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been declared one of the top 10 global public health challenges of our age by the World Health Organization, and the World Bank describes AMR as a crisis affecting the finance, health, and agriculture sectors and a major threat to the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals. But what is AMR? It is a phenotype that evolves in microbes exposed to antimicrobial molecules and causes dangerous infections. This suggests that scientists and healthcare workers should be on the frontline in the search for sustainable solutions to AMR. Yet AMR is also a societal problem to be understood by everyone. This review aims to explore the need to address the problem of AMR through a coherent, international strategy with buy-in from all sectors of society. As reviewed here, the sustainable solutions to AMR will be driven by better understanding of AMR biology but will require more than this alone to succeed. Some advances on the horizon, such as the use of bacteriophage (phage) to treat AMR infections. However, many of the new technologies and new therapeutics to address AMR require access to biodiversity, where the custodians of that biodiversity-and the traditional knowledge required to access it-are needed as key partners in the scientific, clinical, biotechnological, and international ventures that would treat the problem of AMR and ultimately prevent its further evolution. Many of these advances will be built on microbial assessments to understand the extent of AMR in our environments and bioprospecting to identify microbes that may have beneficial uses. Genuine partnerships for access to this biodiversity and sharing of benefits accrued require a consideration of ethical practice and behavior. Behavior change is needed across all sectors of culturally diverse societies so that rapid deployment of solutions can be implemented for maximum effect against the impacts of AMR.

Indexed as

BioprospectingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiodiversityDrug Resistance, MicrobialGlobal HealthHumansPublic HealthSustainable DevelopmentAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceethical bioprospectingmicrobial diversityMRSAphage therapytraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID39718471
PMCPMC11668235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.