ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2025
Significant Environmental Factors in the Drift of Electrical Properties in Conductive Nano-Composite Sensors for Biomechanical Motion-Tracking.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wearable sensor technologies for individuals with back pain: a scoping review.Pain management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable nanocomposite stretch sensors are an exciting new development in biomaterials for biomechanical motion-tracking technology, with applications in the treatment of low back pain, knee rehabilitation, fetal movement tracking, and other fields. When strained, the resistance of the low-cost sensors is reduced, enabling human motion to be monitored using a suitable sensor array. However, current sensor technologies have exhibited significant drift, in the form of increased electrical resistance, if left stored in typical room conditions. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the influence of several environmental factors, including temperature, humidity, oxygen levels, and light exposure, that could impact the change in electrical properties of these sensors. These physiological conditions are present during use of the sensors on human subjects as well as during sensor storage, making it vital to understand their effects on sensor properties. The electromechanical performance of the sensors stored under a range of conditions was monitored over a period of several weeks. The observations obtained indicate that the presence of oxygen and humidity in the environment where the sensors are stored is the primary contributor to drift in the sensor response. Sensors that are kept in de-oxygenated or desiccated environments do not display an increase in electrical resistance over time. This understanding allows for long-term storage of the sensors without degradation. It also assists in identifying the internal processes at work within the nanoparticle-polymer matrix that cause changes in electrical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.