Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718117›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2024

Clinical and prognostic relevance of

Thibaud Robin, Marie Bigay, Chloé Touzet, Kevin Le Boedec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thibaud RobinCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Fregis - IVC Evidensia France, Paris, France.
Marie BigayCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Fregis - IVC Evidensia France, Paris, France.
Chloé TouzetClinique vétérinaire Olliolis, Ollioules, France.
Kevin Le BoedecCentre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Fregis - IVC Evidensia France, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8427-0520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare two groups of cats with lower respiratory tract disease, one with

methodsAll cats for which

resultsA total of 55 cats were included (19 in the M+ group and 36 in the M- group). Significant differences were detected between the two groups in the prevalence of systemic signs (M+: 0%, M-: 28%; CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The presence of radiographic alveolar lesions and neutrophilia in BALF was significantly associated with the detection of

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCat DiseasesMycoplasmaMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsCohort StudiesFemaleMalePrognosisRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbronchoalveolar lavageMycoplasma felisprognosisradiographyrespiratory

Identifiers

PMID39718117
PMCPMC11682572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.