Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39718089›Full record

ReviewArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju2024

Tattooing: immediate and long-term adverse reactions and complications.

Slavica Dodig, Daniela Čepelak-Dodig, Davor Gretić, Ivana Čepelak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Silicoanthracosis: A melanoma mimicker.Radiology case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Slavica Dodig1University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Haematology, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-5171
Daniela Čepelak-Dodig2Croatian Institute of Public Health, Division for Toxicology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Davor Gretić2Croatian Institute of Public Health, Division for Toxicology, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana Čepelak1University of Zagreb Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Haematology, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tattooing has become a popular global trend in industrialised countries, with the highest prevalence rates of up to 30-40 % in the adult population younger than 40 years. Common tattoo inks may contain heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and primary aromatic amines, toxic if exceeding permissible limits. It is estimated that about 14.36 mg of ink is injected per cm

Indexed as

TattooingAdultColoring AgentsFemaleHumansInkMaleColoring Agentsfibrosisfibrozagranulomatous changesgranulomatozne promjenehypersensitivity reactionsinfectioninflammation of the skiniritacijairritationmalignant diseasesreakcije preosjetljivostisistemske upalesystemic inflammationtattoo inktinta za tetoviranjeupala kožezloćudne bolesti

Identifiers

PMID39718089
PMCPMC11739707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.