ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2025
Recent advances in nanomaterials for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (Review).
Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Zoonotic Tuberculosis and Dairy Products: Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Public Health Implications.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Pooled it
- Liver specific-inhibition of LPCAT3 ameliorates metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing cancer treatment with senotherapeutics: a current perspective.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Targeting cuproptosis opens a new chapter of nanomedicine: a scientometric and graphical analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Future Research Directions on Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy-Based Biosensors for Label-Free Detection of Pathogens.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The world's leading infectious disease killer tuberculosis (TB) has >10 million new cases and ~1.5 million mortalities yearly. Effective TB control and management depends on accurate and timely diagnosis to improve treatment, curb transmission and reduce the burden on the medical system. Current clinical diagnostic methods for tuberculosis face the shortcomings of limited accuracy and sensitivity, time consumption and high cost of equipment and reagents. Nanomaterials have markedly enhanced the sensitivity, specificity and speed of TB detection in recent years, owing to their distinctive physical and chemical features. They offer several biomolecular binding sites, enabling the simultaneous identification of multiple TB biomarkers. Biosensors utilizing nanomaterials are often compact, user‑friendly and well‑suited for detecting TB on location and in settings with limited resources. The present review aimed to review the advances that have occurred during the last five years in the application of nanomaterials for TB diagnostics, focusing on their detection capabilities, structures, working principles and the significance of key nanomaterials. The current review addressed the limitations and challenges of nanomaterials‑based TB diagnostics, along with potential solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.