ArticleToxicology reports2024
Association between chronic lead exposure and markers of kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Toxicology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The toxic footprint of lead exposure: oxido-inflammatory biomarkers in urban populations of Niger Delta, Nigeria.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026Article
- Lead Management in Perovskite Photovoltaics: Status and Perspectives.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Eucalyptol alleviates lead-induced nephrotoxicity in rats by suppressing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, and enhancing the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Environmental Pollution and Its Impact on Kidney Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Mechanisms of Lead Toxicity in Living Organisms.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In view of inconsistent reports on the association between chronic lead (Pb) exposure and renal injury markers (potential site of injury), the present systematic review explored their association by reviewing studies that investigated chronic Pb-exposed and those without obvious Pb exposure. Studies reporting blood Pb levels(BLL) and biomarkers of kidney injury [i.e. N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), Micro-Globulin(μG) and others] among chronic Pb-exposed and unexposed individuals were systematically searched from digital databases available until February 26, 2024. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Guidelines were adhered to during the execution. Pooled effect size and heterogeneity were estimated using the random effect model and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.