Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717836›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2024

The Restoration of the Prearthritic Joint Line Does Not Guarantee the Natural Knee Kinematics: A Gait Analysis Evaluation Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Andrea Giordano Salvi, Pieralberto Valpiana, Bernardo Innocenti, Stefano Ghirardelli, Matteo Bernardi, Giuseppe Petralia, Giuseppe Aloisi, Karlos Zepeda, Christian Schaller, Pier Francesco Indelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Giordano SalviSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.
Pieralberto ValpianaSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.
Bernardo InnocentiPersonalized Arthroplasty Society (PAS), Atlanta, GA, USA.
Stefano GhirardelliSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.
Matteo BernardiSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.
Giuseppe PetraliaDipartimento di Medicina Clinica, Sanita' Pubblica, Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Universita' degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giuseppe AloisiDipartimento di Medicina Clinica, Sanita' Pubblica, Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Universita' degli Studi dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Karlos ZepedaTouro College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics, New York, NY, USA.
Christian SchallerSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.
Pier Francesco IndelliSüdtiroler Sanitätsbetrieb, Department Orthopaedic Surgery, Brixen, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unrestricted kinematic alignment (uKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the theoretical advantage of reproducing patients' constitutional alignment and restoring the pre-arthritic joint line position and obliquity. However, modifications of the original uKA technique have been proposed due to the potential risk of mechanical failure and instability. Given the significant variability in soft tissue behavior within the same bony morphology group, uKA pure knee resurfacing could be occasionally detrimental. This study aimed to kinematically compare the outcomes of uKA TKA with those of a robotic-assisted KA TKA technique based on specific soft-tissue boundaries. Methods: In this retrospective gait analysis study, 24 TKA patients and 12 healthy controls were recruited. Inclusion criteria were a 9-month minimum follow-up from successfully, primary medial-pivot or medially-congruent TKA performed for isolated degenerative joint disease. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned to two surgical groups: A) uKA (#12) and B) robot-assisted (#12), KA (hybrid-kinematic) with boundaries (±3° from hip-knee-ankle neutral axis) and a slight intercompartmental gap asymmetry (max 2 mm lateral-opening). The gait analysis was performed using instrumented treadmills equipped with 3D cameras. Results: Sagittal knee kinematic data: during the early-stance phase of gait, the uKA group showed a less consistent weight-acceptance phase and a less efficient transition between the first knee-flexion peak and mid-stance-extension plateau with respect to the hybrid-kinematic alignment group. Spatiotemporal and overall gait quality data: no significant differences were found between the two TKA groups regarding walking speed ( Conclusions: This study showed that restoring the pre-arthritic joint line, as advocated by surgeons following the uKA philosophy, does not guarantee a closer-to-normal knee kinematics.

Indexed as

AlignmentGait analysisKinematic alignmentMedial pivotRoboticsTKA

Identifiers

PMID39717836
PMCPMC11665368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.