ArticleJPRAS open2025
Xeroform gauze versus silver sulfadiazine for mixed-depth pediatric scald injuries: A retrospective study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Silver sulfadiazine 1 % cream had historically been the mainstay initial treatment for scald wounds at our institution. However, we transitioned to using closed dressings of only petrolatum-impregnated 3 % bismuth tribromophenate gauze (Xeroform) for all partial-thickness burns. Xeroform adheres to the wound while allowing the exudates to drain and acts as a scaffold for re-epithelialization, after which it falls off without traumatizing the wound bed, theoretically allowing viable tissue to declare itself while requiring less frequent dressing changes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients aged ≤5 years with mixed-depth scald injuries between the years 1) 2004 and 2008, during which silver sulfadiazine was the standard initial choice and 2) 2015 and 2018, when only Xeroform was used as the standard. Results: The study included 347 patients, among whom 200 were treated with silver sulfadiazine and 147 were treated with Xeroform alone. The 2 groups had similar burn sizes and rates of skin grafting (silver group 30/200 [15.0 %] and Xeroform group 20/147 [17.7 %]) However, the Xeroform group showed longer time from injury to grafting (24 vs. 9.9 days, Conclusions: These findings suggest that using Xeroform may promote better wound healing than using silver sulfadiazine. In addition, patients with Xeroform can be discharged with their dressings in place for grafting in the outpatient setting, during which time they are in closed dressings without frequent changes and associated discomfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.