ArticleJPRAS open2025
The future of free flap monitoring by laser continuous doppler flowmetry: A prospective assessment in consecutive 71 patients.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A soft biosensor with printable responsive hydrogel interfaces for detection and differentiation of blood circulation complications.National science review · 2026Article
- Autonomization of Microvascular Free Flaps in Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.Microsurgery · 2026Review
- AETHER: Video-Based Smartphone Free Flap Monitoring Using Spatial Phase Coherence and Reference-Corrected Augmented Imaging.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Reconstructive Microsurgery.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Feasibility of Portable Laser Doppler Flowmeter for Foot Blood Flow Assessment in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.EJVES vascular forum · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography in Lower Extremity Injuries: A Systematic Review.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) in detecting perfusion disturbances during microvascular free tissue transfer. Methods: Conducted at a single centre from December 2020 to September 2022, this prospective study involved 71 patients mainly undergoing head and neck free flap reconstructions, using the Pocket LDF™ for continuous perfusion monitoring. Results: Out of the 71 cases, data from 69 cases were analysed after excluding those with significant noise or sensor detachment. Blood flow disturbances were observed in 9 cases (13.0 %), with 5 of these cases with a history of surgery or radiation in the same area. There were 5 cases of ischaemia, 4 of which occurred during monitoring. There were 4 cases of venous congestion, with 1 occurring during monitoring. Re-operation was necessary in 8 cases (11.6 %), involving flap replacements, vascular re-anastomoses and hematoma evacuation. Complete flap necrosis occurred in 5 cases (7.2 %) and partial necrosis occurred in 3 cases (4.3 %). The LDF device demonstrated the ability to identify perfusion issues hours before the clinical symptoms manifested, suggesting its potential for early intervention. However, challenges included maintaining continuous monitoring immediately post-surgery and during patient transfers. Conclusion: LDF is a valuable, non-invasive tool for early detection of perfusion disturbances in free flap procedures. It provides continuous, real-time feedback on microcirculation, facilitating timely interventions. Despite its benefits, enhancements in sensor adhesion and wireless technology are needed to improve monitoring reliability. Further studies are recommended to refine LDF usage and validate its efficacy in various clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.