Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717691›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Food-Away-From-Home Options in Local Military Nutrition Environments.

Katie M Kirkpatrick, Deborah J Robinson, Sarah J Hinman, Jessica L Kegel, Rachel A Chamberlin, Rory G McCarthy, Jonathan M Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katie M KirkpatrickConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Deborah J RobinsonConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sarah J HinmanConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jessica L KegelConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rachel A ChamberlinConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Rory G McCarthyConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jonathan M ScottConsortium for Health and Military Performance, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Americans have increased their intake of food away from home, which is lower in quality and higher in calories than food prepared at home. The increase of operations that serve food also impacts the military nutrition environment-including all foods, beverages, and dietary supplements available to the military community-and its role in nutritional fitness. Methods: As part of a pilot study, 5 military installations used the online Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool to evaluate their local food landscape. Each site then developed an intervention to address a specific venue (e.g., dining facility, express) and a key category (food policy, food availability, or behavioral design) through a targeted intervention. Results: Site teams conducted assessments on a total of 103 venues across 9 venue types. Scores varied widely among and within installations. The overall average Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool score was 52%, with individual installation scores ranging from 39% to 69%. The most commonly targeted facility for intervention was the dining facility. In-person feedback sessions revealed that leadership awareness and support are key facilitators to improving the local food environment. Most users agreed or strongly agreed that the Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool application was easy to navigate. Conclusions: Similar to trends in the general public, the military community has more ways to purchase food away from home, so improving food-away-from-home quality in military settings can have a major impact. A review of local military food environments showed areas of success and opportunities for improvement. Given the prevalence of food away from home, providing and promoting nutritious options can help optimize Service Member nutritional fitness.

Indexed as

Food environmentfood-service interventionsmilitary nutrition

Identifiers

PMID39717691
PMCPMC11664061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.