ArticleAJPM focus2025
Food-Away-From-Home Options in Local Military Nutrition Environments.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Americans have increased their intake of food away from home, which is lower in quality and higher in calories than food prepared at home. The increase of operations that serve food also impacts the military nutrition environment-including all foods, beverages, and dietary supplements available to the military community-and its role in nutritional fitness. Methods: As part of a pilot study, 5 military installations used the online Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool to evaluate their local food landscape. Each site then developed an intervention to address a specific venue (e.g., dining facility, express) and a key category (food policy, food availability, or behavioral design) through a targeted intervention. Results: Site teams conducted assessments on a total of 103 venues across 9 venue types. Scores varied widely among and within installations. The overall average Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool score was 52%, with individual installation scores ranging from 39% to 69%. The most commonly targeted facility for intervention was the dining facility. In-person feedback sessions revealed that leadership awareness and support are key facilitators to improving the local food environment. Most users agreed or strongly agreed that the Military Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool application was easy to navigate. Conclusions: Similar to trends in the general public, the military community has more ways to purchase food away from home, so improving food-away-from-home quality in military settings can have a major impact. A review of local military food environments showed areas of success and opportunities for improvement. Given the prevalence of food away from home, providing and promoting nutritious options can help optimize Service Member nutritional fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.