ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Prevalence of high-risk group for obstructive sleep apnea using the STOP-Bang questionnaire and its association with cardiovascular morbidity.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing sleep-related complaints in head and neck cancer survivors with tumors of airway relevance following radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening in Patients Attending Medical Outpatient Department of Tertiary Care Hospital of Kathmandu: A Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Article
- Navigating ambulatory perioperative care in patients with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea: a narrative review of ambulatory surgery outcomes and opioid safety.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Review
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analytic Synthesis (PROSPERO CRD420251049574).Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder, yet many cases remain undiagnosed. The STOP-Bang questionnaire was developed to identify individuals at high risk of OSA. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of individuals with suspected OSA using the STOP-Bang risk stratification in the general population of South Korea. Additionally, we determined if the STOP-Bang risk stratification independently predicts cardiovascular morbidity. Methods: Data from the eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2019-2020) were used. Participants aged ≥40 with complete data for STOP-Bang questionnaire were included. A STOP-Bang score of ≥5 classified individuals as high-risk whereas scores of 3-4 and less than 3 classified them as intermediate- and low-risk, respectively. The association between the high-risk group and cardiovascular morbidity was analyzed using complex sample logistic regression. Results: Among the 6,630 participants included, approximately 6.7% were classified as high-risk based on the STOP-Bang questionnaire. The prevalence of diagnosed OSA in the high-risk group was 4.0%. The high-risk group showed a significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular morbidity (11.9%) compared to those in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (3.0 and 8.1%, respectively). After adjusting for variables associated with cardiovascular risk, the high-risk group remained an independent predictor of increased likelihood of cardiovascular morbidity compared to the low-risk group (odds ratio, 2.05; Conclusion: We found a significant proportion of individuals at high risk of OSA is likely to remain undiagnosed in the general population of South Korea. The high-risk group demonstrated a higher burden of cardiovascular morbidity, and the STOP-Bang high-risk group was an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.