ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2024
Exploring cytokine outputs for
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Insights Into Immunomodulatory Strategies for Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: An EAACI Task Force Report.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- In vitro diagnostics of drug hypersensitivity reactions.Allergologie select · 2026Review
- Utility of IFN-γ Enzyme-Linked Immunospot as Adjunctive Diagnostic for Severe T Cell-Mediated Reactions to Cotrimoxazole in High HIV and Tuberculosis Settings.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Article
- Elucidating CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell involvement in patients with vancomycin-induced DRESS.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
- Refining cytokine-based diagnostics in DRESS: A two-color IFN-γ/IL-4 ELISpot approach.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In an exploratory study to assess the potential to individualize T-cell diagnostics in antibiotic-associated severe T-cell mediated hypersensitivity, we focused on drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and the related cytokine outputs IL-4 and IL-5. Methods: Patients with well-phenotyped RegiSCAR ≥4 DRESS, positive intradermal skin testing, and a previous negative IFN-γ Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay were prospectively recruited. We specifically performed an ELISpot assay with IL-4 and IL-5 cytokine outputs. As comparative controls, these cytokine outputs were performed simultaneously in patients with a positive Results: Four antibiotic-associated DRESS cases were included. The IL-4 and IL-5 output ELISpot assay demonstrated various results among these patients, with at least 1 cytokine present in all the cases. As for the 2 controls with known positive IFN-γ release, compared to the IFN-γ secretion, the cytokine output using IL-4 and IL-5 showed an increased positivity. Conclusion: In patients where the early response has suggested a TH2 response such as DRESS, IL-4 and IL-5 cytokine outputs could present an investigational advantage, including when IFN-γ is negative. In the future, larger prospective studies are required to understand the role of varied cytokine outputs in T-cell-mediated hypersensitivities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.