ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024
Patients' suggestions for improvements to text-based e-consultations. An online survey of users of the national health portal in Norway.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patients' Experiences With Using a Digital Platform for Chat-Based Consultation in Primary Health Care in Sweden: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, text-based e-consultations have been widely implemented in general practice and are appreciated by patients for their convenience and efficiency. Policymakers aim to enhance patient access to clinical services with the general practitioner (GP) through text-based e-consultations. However, concerns are raised about their efficiency and security. We aimed to investigate users' perceptions of potential improvements in the text-based e-consultation service provided by the national health portal in Norway. Method: We conducted an online survey among users of text-based e-consultations with the GP on the national health portal Helsenorge. The survey was available from January-February 2023 and consisted of 20 questions. This study focused on the free-text answers to the question " Results: The analysis of 2,954 free-text answers from users of the national e-consultation service resulted in six areas where suggestions for improvement were expressed. According to users, the service would benefit from: (1) a better set-up to facilitate the formulation of the patient's problem, (2) better value for money (in regards to both price and quality), (3) faster response time, (4) improved information and predictability about the status of the e-consultation (e.g., if it is received and when to expect an answer), (5) improvement in technical issues, and (6) improvement of access to dialogue-based services to replace or complement e-consultations. Conclusion: The analysis of users' suggestions for improvements to the e-consultation service emphasised the need to customise the service to address individual patient needs. Users found a one-size-fits-all approach with mandatory questions, fixed pricing, and inflexible response times less appreciated. Some also felt forced to rely on e-consultations due to the perceived poor availability of other GP services. This highlights the importance of perceiving e-consultations not as a replacement for dialogue-enabled services, but rather as a potentially efficient addition, ensuring a well-tailored setup for appropriate patient use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.