ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Integration of Microarray Data and Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis to Explore Key Genes Associated with Macrophage Infiltration in Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myocardial fibrosis and glycolysis: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis (2000-2024).Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Itaconate modulates myeloid inflammation in myocardial infarction via metabolic and structural reprogramming.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac macrophages are a heterogeneous population with high plasticity and adaptability, and their mechanisms in heart failure (HF) remain poorly elucidated. Methods: We used single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data to reveal the heterogeneity of non-cardiomyocytes and assess the immunoreactivity of each subpopulation. Additionally, we employed four integrated machine learning algorithms to identify macrophage-related genes with diagnostic value, and in vivo validation was performed. To assess the immune infiltration characteristics in HF, we utilized the CIBERSORT and single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). An unsupervised consensus clustering algorithm was applied to identify the macrophage-related HF subtypes. Furthermore, the scMetabolism was employed to explore the specific metabolic patterns of the macrophage subtypes. Finally, CellChat was used to investigate cell-cell interactions among the identified subtypes. Results: The immunoreactivity score of macrophages in the HF was higher than that in the other cell types. GSEA of macrophage clusters indicated a significant enrichment of leukocyte-mediated immune processes, antigen processing, and presentation. The intersection of the results from machine learning revealed that SERPINA3, GPAT3, ANPEP, and FCER1G can serve as feature genes and form a diagnostic model with a good predictive capability. Unsupervised consensus clustering algorithms reveal the immune and metabolic subtypes of macrophages. The metabolic heterogeneity of macrophage subpopulations can lead to macrophage polarization into different types, which may be related to the metabolic reprogramming between glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cellular communication revealed that macrophages form a network of interactions with neutrophils to support each other's functions and maintenance. The complex efferent and afferent signals are closely associated with myocardial fibrosis. Conclusion: SERPINA3, GPAT3, ANPEP, and FCER1G can potentially serve as immune therapeutic targets and central biomarkers. The immunological and metabolic heterogeneity of macrophages may offer a more precise direction to explore the mechanisms underlying HF and novel immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.