Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717649›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

The Most Attractive Is Not Always the Preferred: Lessons From Necrophagous Dung Beetle Assemblages in a Region of the Central Amazon.

Mirella Lima Costa, Renato Portela Salomão, Janderson Batista Rodrigues Alencar, César Murilo de Albuquerque Correa, Luciana Iannuzzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mirella Lima CostaPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Biologia Animal Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Renato Portela SalomãoFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Tlalnepantla de Baz Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-7472
Janderson Batista Rodrigues AlencarPós-graduação Em Ecologia Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus Brazil.
César Murilo de Albuquerque CorreaLaboratório de Bioecologia de Scarabaeoidea (Scaralab) Universidade Estadual Do Mato Grosso Do Sul Aquidauana Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2804-7527
Luciana IannuzziPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Biologia Animal Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resource attractiveness and preference is determinant to assess how biodiversity is structured in different ecosystems. Necrophagy is the alternative or complementary dietary habit of dung beetles, but a few studies have focused on evaluating how different carrion types attract different species. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of carrion type on attractiveness and preference of dung beetle taxonomic diversity in a region of Central Amazon. Pitfall traps baited with bovine spleen, chicken liver, and fish (freshwater sardine) were installed. Bait attractiveness was estimated through a sampling design that kept exclusively one food type in the field, while bait preference comprised a sampling design with more than one food type offered simultaneously in a concentrated area. We collected 3151 individuals from 24 dung beetle species. Bovine spleen was the most attractive bait in both food preference and food attractiveness experiments, being the only carrion type in which species demonstrated preference. Each carrion type attracted distinct dung beetle assemblages. This study demonstrates that Amazonian dung beetles prefer specific carrion types, which serves as a basis for future studies related to dung beetle diet.

Indexed as

Amazon rainforestbait preferencecarcassdead corpseScarabaeinaetrophic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39717649
PMCPMC11664420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.