ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Experiences and barriers in downward referral decision-making for palliative care patient caregivers under China's three-tiered linkage model: A qualitative study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing palliative care decision-making participation among elderly patients in the terminal stage: a cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Unpacking Multi-Layered Challenges in Palliative Care Transitions: A Descriptive Qualitative Study of Multidisciplinary Teams in China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Exploring the expectations of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care services: a qualitative study in mainland China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The formation of palliative treatment intentions among patients with advanced gynecological cancer in China: A grounded theory study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore hospice caregivers' downward referral decision-making experiences and barriers under the triadic linkage model in China and to analyze the deeper social dynamics of hospice referral choices. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with caregivers handling hospice referrals from two primary hospice agencies in Nanjing, China. The themes were analyzed and summarized using the Colaizzi 7-step analysis. Results: Four themes and nine subthemes were extracted: multidimensional caregiver psychological experience (Dilemma and Guilt, Emotional Support and Psychological Adaptation), perceived disparities between referral organizations (convenience and affordability in the home community, perceived lack of primary health care resources), limitations of caregiver decision-making (cognitive comprehension bias, difficulty in information seeking, and passive acceptance of decision making), and limitations of health care referral support (lack of health care referral guidance, inadequate referral handoffs). Conclusions: Feedback from caregivers of hospice-referred patients reveals many barriers to hospice referral decision making and referral implementation. Overcoming these barriers entails efforts to change the cognitive misunderstandings regarding hospice referrals from patients' perspective, clarify the distribution of responsibilities among hospice agencies, and provide information support and decision-making assistance. These measures must be employed to improve the implementation of hospice referral, realize the multiple benefits of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment, boost patients' satisfaction with the referrals, and ensure the rational and efficient distribution of hospice resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.