Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717574›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

From tradition to smart: A comprehensive review of the evolution and prospects of land use planning tools.

Yong Liu, Walter Timo de Vries, Guanghong Zhang, Xufeng Cui

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong LiuSchool of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China.
Walter Timo de VriesSchool of Engineering and Design, Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, 80333, Germany.
Guanghong ZhangSchool of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China.
Xufeng CuiSchool of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use planning tools are essential for effective land management. However, existing research has not thoroughly explored the evolution and future potential of these tools. This study addresses this gap through comprehensive literature review and data collection, mapping the progression of land use planning tools from their inception to their future trajectories. Our findings indicate that land use planning tools have evolved through four distinct epochs: 1.0 to 4.0. These epochs are defined as follows: Foundational Surveying Tools (1900s-1950s), Computerized Tools (1960s-1980s), Internet Technology Tools (1990s-2000s), and Smart Tools (2010s to Present). Presently, these tools face several limitations, including complex and redundant planning systems, poor adaptability, insufficient public engagement, and a lack of emphasis on sustainable development. Looking ahead, the emergence of the 5.0 era around the 2040s is anticipated, marked by advancements such as blockchain, VR/AR, quantum computing, and digital twins. This study provides valuable insights for scholars in the field and informs future development of land use planning tools.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAugmented RealityBlockchainDigital twinningGeographic information systemsLand planningQuantum computingRemote sensingVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID39717574
PMCPMC11665401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.