Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717521›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Principles of Fracture Healing and Fixation: A Literature Review.

Mohammad Waseem Beeharry, Belal Ahmad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammad Waseem BeeharryTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GBR.
Belal AhmadTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone healing is a complex, dynamic process involving a series of well-coordinated stages, influenced by both mechanical and biological factors. The skeletal system, composed of inorganic (36%), organic (36%), and water (28%) components by volume, plays a crucial role in maintaining structural integrity and mineral homeostasis. Bone is classified into two main types based on microstructure: lamellar and woven bone, with lamellar bone being stronger and more durable. Factors such as inflammation, the periosteum, vascularity, and infection significantly impact healing outcomes. Moreover, fracture fixation is fundamental to optimal healing, guided by principles of anatomical reduction, stable fixation, blood supply preservation, and early mobilisation. Perren's strain theory emphasises the importance of strain at the fracture site, which can determine whether primary or secondary healing occurs. Rigid fixation provides an environment which promotes primary bone healing, while flexible fixation promotes secondary healing through controlled motion. Internal and external fixation methods, including plates, screws, and intramedullary nails, offer varying degrees of stability, supporting bone healing. Overall, optimal fracture fixation, combined with an understanding of bone biology, enhances healing and functional recovery.

Indexed as

fixation constructsfracture fixationfracture healingprinciples of fracture fixationstages of fracture healing

Identifiers

PMID39717521
PMCPMC11665253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.