ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2024
Clinical Performance and Safety of Cerviron® Vaginal Ovules in the Management of Symptomatic Cervical Lesions: A National, Multicentric Study.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04735718 (A Prospective, Open-Label, Pilot, Multicentric Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Cerviron® Ovules in Cervix Lesions Postoperative Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Open-Label, Pilot, Multicentric Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of Cerviron® Ovules in Cervix Lesions Postoperative Care
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical ectropion is frequently associated with vaginal symptoms requiring therapeutic intervention. However, no scientific consensus has been reached regarding the use of local re-epithelialization therapy to prevent severe bleeding, wound inflammation, and infection of cervical lesions. Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the aspect of the cervix by colposcopy after a 3-month treatment with an intravaginal medical device in the context of postoperative care of the symptomatic ectropion. The study analyzed additional clinical parameters, such as the evolution of primary and secondary inflammation and the degree of cervical epithelialization as secondary objectives. Methods: Our pilot study included 27 participants with symptomatic cervical ectopy, with or without an associated human papillomavirus infection. The treatment protocol consisted of the monthly delivery of the medical device intravaginally, during day 1 to day 15, with a total study duration of 3 months. Results: The medical device had a positive impact on cervical epithelialization, in terms of aspect of the cervix returning to normal for 100% of the participants. Between study visits, it was observed that primary inflammation was reduced by 85.19%, whereas vaginal ulceration, colpitis, and leukorrhea were improved by 70.37%, 81.48%, and by 66.67%, respectively. Conclusions: The degree of cervical epithelialization reflects how well the cervix has healed after an injury or infection. The device showed clinical performance in complete re-epithelialization after surgical procedures. Moreover, our study findings suggest that supportive treatment with this intravaginal medical device can be recommended for cervical wound healing in patients with human papillomavirus infection. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04735718.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.