Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717489›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

Impact of a nurse practitioner-led dedicated outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy clinic on patient outcomes and administrative workload: a retrospective cohort study.

Makoto Ibaraki, Zachary Gruss, Emily Wings, Jaclyn E Geronimo, Janine M Varnes, Joel A Kammeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Makoto IbarakiUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3736-732X
Zachary GrussProMedica - Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA.
Emily WingsProMedica - Toledo Hospital, Toledo, OH, USA.
Jaclyn E GeronimoUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.
Janine M VarnesUniversity of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.
Joel A KammeyerDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Mail Stop 1186, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8984-4178

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) enhances patient safety, improves outcomes, and reduces healthcare costs by decreasing 30-day readmissions and adverse events. However, the optimal structure and follow-up protocols for OPAT programs remain undefined. Identifying high-risk patients for readmission and managing adverse drug events (ADEs) are critical components of OPAT care. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a dedicated OPAT clinic on hospital readmissions, and quantified the administrative workload required to manage patients on OPAT post-discharge. Design: A retrospective, pre-post cohort study compared patient outcomes before and after the implementation of a dedicated OPAT clinic across a single clinic and multiple hospitals. Methods: Patients discharged on OPAT from October 2018 to March 2019 (control group) and from September 2021 to February 2022 (intervention group) were included. The primary outcome was 30-day hospital readmission. Secondary outcomes included administrative workload measured by telephone calls and nursing tasks. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models to identify independent risk factors for readmission. Results: A total of 361 patients were included (median age 63 years, 62.1% men). Of these, 239 patients (66.2%) received OPAT post-clinic implementation. Common diagnoses included bacteremia (17.7%) and osteomyelitis (17.5%), with MRSA (17.2%) and Streptococci (14.4%) as predominant pathogens. The median OPAT duration was 14 days, and the median hospital stay was 7 days. Readmissions within 30 days occurred in 24.9% of patients, while 27.7% visited the emergency department. ADEs were reported in 18.9% of patients. Readmission rates decreased from 30.5% in the pre-clinic cohort to 20.1% in the post-clinic cohort ( Conclusion: The implementation of a dedicated OPAT clinic was associated with reduced readmissions and improved patient management, suggesting that structured follow-up care may improve outcomes. This study highlights the administrative challenges of OPAT, emphasizing the need for dedicated personnel and efficient coordination. Future research should focus on optimizing OPAT care models and establishing sustainable funding strategies.

Indexed as

administrative burdenhospital readmissionoutpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy

Identifiers

PMID39717489
PMCPMC11664517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.