ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Toward Multidisciplinary Tools for Complex Clinical Psychopharmacology Cases: A Qualitative Study with French Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Psychopharmacology prescriptions are complex, partly due to the complexity of the relationship between diagnosis and its etiology, as well as the iatrogenic impact on symptomatology. Many multidisciplinary tools exist to optimize their management and improve evidence-based practice. However, their multidisciplinary integration seems to be a challenge. This study aimed to collect information on barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital health professionals regarding the use of multidisciplinary tools to address complex situations in psychopharmacology. Research Design and Methods: A mixed-methods research approach using semi-structured interviews was conducted with physicians and pharmacists from 11 hospital institutions. An interview guide developed from the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation - Behavior) was used to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of multidisciplinary tools. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify emerging themes and mapped to the COM-B model. Results: 28 professionals were interviewed. Identified barriers were: lack of knowledge and time to address complex situations, incomplete medical records, lack of easily accessible multidisciplinary tools, insufficient levels of evidence in psychopharmacology. Identified facilitators were: continuing education, communication and networking among professionals, implementation of adapted and shared resources, deprescribing, awareness of medication-induced iatrogenesis, accessibility of tools for all populations. Conclusion: Identified barriers and facilitators in the use of multidisciplinary tools for complex situations in psychopharmacology helped to model factors that enable behavior change. Answers need to be provided to help professionals ensure and optimize psychopharmacological therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.