Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717484›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024

Analysis of the Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Touch Comfort Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses.

Zheng Yuan, Chunxia Liu, Kun Zhang, Lixia Gao, Sujuan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zheng YuanNursing Department, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Chunxia LiuIntensive Care Unit, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Kun ZhangIntensive Care Unit, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Lixia GaoGeriatric Cardiovascular Department II, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Sujuan SunNursing Department, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang City, 050000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current situation of the touch comfort of nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Grade A tertiary hospitals and analyse its influencing factors, to provide a basis for formulating intervention programmes. Methods: In August 2022, 343 nurses in the ICUs of eight tertiary-level hospitals in Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province were surveyed, and the current situation of nurses' tactile comfort and the factors affecting it in the ICU were analysed using the Nurses' General Information Questionnaire, Nurses' Touch Comfort Scale, Nurses' Humanistic Qualities Self-Assessment Scale and Nursing Work Environment Scale. Results: The mean score for the tactile comfort of ICU nurses was (5.16±1.25). Staffing, ICU nurses' family support, nursing work environment and nurses' humanistic qualities were positively correlated with ICU nurses and tactile comfort, whereas job title was negatively correlated with ICU nurses and tactile comfort. Conclusion: The touch comfort of nurses in ICUs is good, and the physiological dimension is at the medium level. Nursing managers could take comprehensive measures to strengthen the cultivation of nurses' humanistic quality, improve the nursing working environment in the ICU, improve nurses' touch comfort and promote the improvement of nursing service.

Indexed as

comfort with touchinfluencing factorsintensive care unitnursesnurses’ humanistic quality self-assessment scalethe nursing work environment

Identifiers

PMID39717484
PMCPMC11663996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.