Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717450›Full record

ReviewInterventional pain medicine2024

Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Ryan Mattie, Alan Bingtao Lin, Harjot Bhandal, Benjamin Gill, Jennifer Tram, Samamtha Braun, Nitin Prabakar, Claire Tian Yin, Nick Brar, Andrew Fox and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan MattieInterventional Pain Management, Total Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alan Bingtao LinOrtho-Gen Pain Management and Sports Medicine, Folsom, CA, USA.
Harjot BhandalEvolve Restorative Center, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.
Benjamin GillOmaha Pain Physicians, Omaha, NE, USA.
Jennifer TramDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, VA Greater LA Health Care System/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samamtha BraunDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas, San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Nitin PrabakarDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Claire Tian YinSUNY Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Nick BrarProvidence St. Joseph Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andrew FoxDirector of Spine Surgery, Total Spine Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mikhail SaltychevDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) is a widely recognized treatment for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), particularly in cases where traditional methods are ineffective. This paper systematically reviews randomized controlled trials to analyze the efficacy of SCS, as well as Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation in treating CRPS, focusing on its long-term effectiveness. Methods: This systematic review focused exclusively on randomized controlled trials to assess a primary outcome of improvement in pain symptoms in patients diagnosed with CRPS. The primary outcomes assessed were pain reduction and patient satisfaction, with attention to functional improvement, quality of life improvement, preference for waveform settings, and complications when such data was made available. Results: The results showed significant pain reduction in CRPS patients treated with SCS and DRG. Preference for specific SCS settings varied among patients, with no clear superiority of one setting over another. Innovations in SCS technology, including novel waveforms and frequencies, demonstrated potential for enhanced efficacy and patient comfort. Conclusions: The review underscores the importance of SCS and DRG as significant treatment options to reduce pain for patients suffering from CRPS. It highlights the need for ongoing research to optimize SCS therapy, focusing on individual patient preferences and responses to different stimulation parameters. This personalized approach could lead to improved patient outcomes in CRPS management. Additionally, as this study only contained data from Randomized Controlled Trials, inclusion of well-conducted observational studies may help to provide stronger evidence for use of this therapy in CRPS patients.

Indexed as

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)NeuromodulationPain managementSCS waveformsSpinal cord stimulation (SCS)

Identifiers

PMID39717450
PMCPMC11664400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.