Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717439›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis: a literature review and case study.

Anthony Matta, Fabienne Ory Magne, Thierry Levade, Fabrice Bonneville, Jean Ferrières

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony MattaDepartment of Cardiology, Civilian Hospitals of Colmar, Colmar, France.
Fabienne Ory MagneINSERM, UMR1214 Toulouse NeuroImaging Centre "TONIC," Centre Expert Parkinson de Toulouse, Service de Neurologie, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Thierry LevadeInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR1037, Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire de Biochimie, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Fabrice BonnevilleDepartment of Neuroradiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Jean FerrièresDepartment of Cardiology, INSERM UMR 1295, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX) is a rare but treatable inherited neurometabolic disorder that can lead to severe sequelae if left untreated. Chenodeoxycholic acid is a safe and effective treatment for CTX. Early diagnosis is essential to improve patient outcomes. Neurological disturbances, cataracts, and intractable diarrhea are key features to raise diagnostic suspicion and differentiate CTX from other metabolic disorders in patients with dyslipidemia and xanthomas. The diagnosis of CTX depends on high cholestanol plasma levels, undetectable plasma bile acids, neuroradiological findings, and CYP27A1 gene analysis. This review provides a stepwise approach to diagnosing patients with CTX, aims to improve physician awareness of CTX, and highlights the effectiveness of chenodeoxycholic acid as the standard of care. In addition, we report a unique case of CTX with major premature cardiovascular events, initially misdiagnosed as heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. This review also provides evidence to establish the c.470T>C (p. Leu157Pro) variant of the CYP27A1 gene as a likely pathologic variant.

Indexed as

bile acid synthesiscerebrotendinous xanthomatosischenodeoxycholic acidcholestanolreview

Identifiers

PMID39717439
PMCPMC11663867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.