Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717428›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024

Multiple Instance Learning for WSI: A comparative analysis of attention-based approaches.

Martim Afonso, Praphulla M S Bhawsar, Monjoy Saha, Jonas S Almeida, Arlindo L Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martim AfonsoInstituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal.
Praphulla M S BhawsarDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20850, MD, USA.
Monjoy SahaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20850, MD, USA.
Jonas S AlmeidaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20850, MD, USA.
Arlindo L OliveiraInstituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisbon 1049-001, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole slide images (WSI), obtained by high-resolution digital scanning of microscope slides at multiple scales, are the cornerstone of modern Digital Pathology. However, they represent a particular challenge to artificial intelligence (AI)-based/AI-mediated analysis because pathology labeling is typically done at slide-level, instead of tile-level. It is not just that medical diagnostics is recorded at the specimen level, the detection of oncogene mutation is also experimentally obtained, and recorded by initiatives like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), at the slide level. This configures a dual challenge: (a) accurately predicting the overall cancer phenotype and (b) finding out what cellular morphologies are associated with it at the tile level. To better understand and address these challenges, two existing weakly supervised Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) approaches were explored and compared: Attention MIL (AMIL) and Additive MIL (AdMIL). These architectures were analyzed on tumor detection (a task where these models obtained good results previously) and TP53 mutation detection (a much less explored task). For tumor detection, we built a dataset from Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-LUSC) slides, with 349 positive and 349 negative slides. The patches were extracted from 5× magnification. For TP53 mutation detection, we explored a dataset built from Invasive Breast Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) slides, with 347 positive and 347 negative slides. In this case, we explored three different magnification levels: 5×, 10×, and 20×. Our results show that a modified additive implementation of MIL matched the performance of reference implementation (AUC 0.96), and was only slightly outperformed by AMIL (AUC 0.97) on the tumor detection task. TP53 mutation was most sensitive to features at the higher applications where cellular morphology is resolved. More interestingly from the perspective of the molecular pathologist, we highlight the possible ability of these MIL architectures to identify distinct sensitivities to morphological features (through the detection of regions of interest, ROIs) at different amplification levels. This ability for models to obtain tile-level ROIs is very appealing to pathologists as it provides the possibility for these algorithms to be integrated in a digital staining application for analysis, facilitating the navigation through these high-dimensional images and the diagnostic process.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismCancerMultiple instance learningTP53Whole slide image

Identifiers

PMID39717428
PMCPMC11665302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.