ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
Deep clustering representation of spatially resolved transcriptomics data using multi-view variational graph auto-encoders with consensus clustering.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive survey of computer vision methods for spatial transcriptomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- STransfer: a transfer learning-enhanced graph convolutional network for clustering spatial transcriptomics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- SpaBatch: Deep Learning-Based Cross-Slice Integration and 3D Spatial Domain Identification in Spatial Transcriptomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Computer Vision Methods for Spatial Transcriptomics: A Survey.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of spatial transcriptomics (ST) technology has provided unprecedented opportunities to understand tissue relationships and functions within specific spatial contexts. Accurate identification of spatial domains is crucial for downstream spatial transcriptomics analysis. However, effectively combining gene expression data, histological images and spatial coordinate data to identify spatial domains remains a challenge. To this end, we propose STMVGAE, a novel spatial transcriptomics analysis tool that combines a multi-view variational graph autoencoder with a consensus clustering framework. STMVGAE begins by extracting histological images features using a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) and integrates these features with gene expression data to generate augmented gene expression profiles. Subsequently, multiple graphs (views) are constructed using various similarity measures, capturing different aspects of the spatial and transcriptional relationships. These views, combined with the augmented gene expression data, are then processed through variational graph auto-encoders (VGAEs) to learn multiple low-dimensional latent embeddings. Finally, the model employs a consensus clustering method to integrate the clustering results derived from these embeddings, significantly improving clustering accuracy and stability. We applied STMVGAE to five real datasets and compared it with five state-of-the-art methods, showing that STMVGAE consistently achieves competitive results. We assessed its capabilities in spatial domain identification and evaluated its performance across various downstream tasks, including UMAP visualization, PAGA trajectory inference, spatially variable gene (SVG) identification, denoising, batch integration, and other analyses. All code and public datasets used in this paper is available at https://github.com/wenwenmin/STMVGAE and https://zenodo.org/records/13119867.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.