ArticleCureus2024
Reducing Time Taken to Gather Equipment for Venepuncture and Cannulation: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTimely gathering of equipment for venepuncture or cannulation on hospital wards is important, particularly in emergency situations. Anecdotally several doctors working at a hospital in England expressed frustration at low equipment stock, layout, and discrepancies between wards leading to significant delays in this process. This quality improvement project therefore aimed to reduce the time taken to gather equipment for venepuncture or cannulation to 20 seconds by June 2023. Methods: Quality improvement methodology was used to define the problem, produce an aim statement, and design several interventions. A flow map was created to understand the equipment collection process, a root cause analysis identified problem areas, and a driver diagram highlighted potential change ideas. A new trolley layout was implemented as part of several plan-do-study-act cycles with the addition of several simple human interventions to maximise its usage. More widespread introduction of identical trolleys across the surgical wards was also achieved. Results: Initial qualitative surveys and the root cause analysis identified a lack of equipment availability, and discrepancies between wards being key barriers to rapid collection of equipment. Prior to any intervention, the average time taken to gather equipment for venepuncture and cannulation was 141 and 137.5 seconds respectively. After implementing a new trolley design and layout, with clear markings and human factor optimisation, the times were reduced to 18 seconds each. Subjective feedback during a cardiac arrest scenario following the intervention was positive. Widespread implementation of the trolleys around the hospital was started following this success although the efficacy of their introduction was not measured during the study period. Conclusion: This quality improvement project successfully reduced the time taken to gather equipment for venepuncture or cannulation on a hospital ward, with positive feedback in an emergency. The project used well-documented quality improvement methodology to achieve this and highlights the ability of empowered clinical staff in non-managerial or non-leadership positions to action change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.