Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717299›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Dissecting Cellulitis Presenting After Hair Restoration Surgery.

Guillermo A Guerrero-González, Gerardo González-Martínez, Jair A Valdez-Zertuche

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillermo A Guerrero-GonzálezDermatologic Surgery, Pango Dermatología, Monterrey, MEX.
Gerardo González-MartínezDermatology, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Nuevo León, MEX.
Jair A Valdez-ZertucheDermatology, Hospital Universitario "Dr. José Eleuterio González", Nuevo León, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dissecting cellulitis (DC) of the scalp is a chronic inflammatory condition marked by neutrophilic cicatricial alopecia, often linked to staphylococcal antigens. This case report details a 34-year-old male with scarring acne who developed DC following follicular unit extraction (FUE) approximately four months prior. Trichoscopic examination revealed brown pigmented dots, erythema, and melicerous crusts. Abscess drainage yielded negative bacterial cultures, leading to a diagnosis of DC. The patient was treated with isotretinoin (20 mg/day), dutasteride (0.5 mg/day), intralesional steroid injections, and salicylic acid-based shampoo. After four months, the patient exhibited significant improvement, with trichoscopic findings showing regrowing hairs and no abnormal hair loss. DC, though commonly associated with other follicular occlusion disorders, has not been previously reported following FUE, indicating a need for awareness of this potential complication. The efficacy of isotretinoin and the emerging role of dutasteride in managing DC highlight the importance of early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Trichoscopy is crucial for diagnosis and monitoring, emphasizing the need for prompt intervention to prevent scarring alopecia. Caution is advised when considering FUE in patients with severe inflammatory acne due to the risk of developing DC.

Indexed as

5-alpha reductase inhibitorsdissecting cellulitisfue hair transplanthair transplantationscarring alopecia

Identifiers

PMID39717299
PMCPMC11665738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.